I asked them at the end how they felt was the way to change the world. I pointed out that in a democracy, sometimes one had to accept a compromise--after all, there may be someone on the opposite side who cares just as much as you. Who's right?
They said:
- Stand up for your beliefs, using anything short of violence
- Sometimes, we have to individually contribute for our beliefs
- Sometimes, we must protest or demonstrate to get others aware of our viewpoints
- We always should live a lifestyle in keeping with what we care about and say.
- Live a life in keeping with beliefs.
- Participate or contribute to problem-solving efforts.
- Try to raise others' awareness of the problem and ways to solve it.
***
I would ask members of the forum--is this good advice? Should we do one of thse things, more or all three? Should we avoid doing them? Is there another approach that is better?
In short (well, long actually): if there is a world problem that we want to give help to, a global issue we want to help solve, do we (1) fundraise (individual contributiopn ad participation), (2) advertise and possibly protest (raising others' awareness), and/or (3) start living our lives so that we do not contribute to the problem?

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote